From: Jeffrey Phillips <jphillips@ovoinnovation.com>
Subject: Innovation Newsletter from OVO
Reply: jphillips@ovoinnovation.com
  
[View HTML Version] [View Text Version]
View Printable Version

Innovation Newsletter from OVO
OVO Logo
OVO Views
Conversations about Innovation
June 2008 - Vol 2, Issue 11
In This Issue
Sign Up
Quick Links
Greetings!
OVO logo

The summer seems like it is already half way over, but we're just getting started with innovation.

In this issue, we'll look first at the strategic choices you need to make when defining an innovation program or competency. What you leave in, and what you take out (intentionally or not) has a great impact on your success.

We'll look at the trend of social networking and "wisdom of crowds" approaches for innovation, and detail four concerns with these methods when you are innovating.

Next, we'll review a new book just out by the consultants at Innosight - The Innovator's Guide to Growth.

Finally, we'll look at the upcoming fall schedule for conferences. There are a number of programs scheduled for the fall that you may want to take advantage of, including the PDMA's Fall conference.

Innovation Model

In everything we do in a business, there's an implicit or explicit model of how things should be done, or what we want to accomplish. A strategy is a plan and a model for how the firm should operate and what it should do. Business processes are models for how the organization should function and create value. Yet few firms take the necessary time to define a model for their future growth and differentiation - innovation.

If innovation is important to ongoing growth and differentiation, then it is far too important to be left to chance. If it is important, innovation efforts should be planned and the organization should have a model for its efforts, goals and expectations.

Compare and Contrast

Since this is an article about innovation, we'd be remiss if we didn't include Apple and Google, so here's the required reference. Apple and Google are referred to quite often as innovators, because they are innovative. Yet, if you carefully consider their innovation models and how innovation is deployed at these two firms, you'll learn that there is no one perfect innovation model.

Google has a free-wheeling, open to anything attitude that expects everyone to innovate. After all, there's the famous 10% time available to Google employees. Most Google employees simply have to find an idea they'd like to work on, pursue it and gain credibility by attracting others to the idea, then scale it up. Google's model expects everyone to actively participate and is generally decentralized.

Apple, on the other hand, has a very different innovation model. Most ideas come from the top (cough, cough Jobs) down. Most of these ideas are worked in very small teams, locked down away from the rest of the organization. Innovation is centralized and often seeks to disrupt an established market. So, you have two "icons" of innovation, very successful in their own rights, with dramatically different innovation models.

Takeaways

There are several takeaways from this quick review of Apple and Google. First, there's no one "right" model of innovation. These two firms demonstrate very different models but have both been successful. Second, a strong innovation culture and innovation leadership are evident in both firms, so culture and leadership are paramount. Third, both of these models expose "facets" or decisions that were made about innovation models, and those facets are of interest to your firm.

Facets

The innovation models we've just examined demonstrated certain consistent characteristics or what we'll call facets. For example, Google's model is fairly decentralized, while Apple's is fairly centralized. Google's model is highly participative, while Apple's is very secretive and controlled. Two important facets of your innovation model are the measure of centralized control - decentralized or centralized, and the breadth of participation - broadly participative, or like Apple, a skunkworks approach. As we've seen from these two examples, either approach may be correct for the specific company, its culture and its chosen innovation model.

Facets Outlined

We believe there are at least eight key facets to consider when building an innovation capability, or initiating an innovation project. In many cases, firms rush in before adequately defining these facets, only to create confusion and lack of clarity about purpose and scope. Thinking through these facets and creating an explicit innovation model will simplify your work, clarify your objectives and make it easier to align to critical strategic goals.

We've defined these facets as:
  1. Open/Closed - the degree to which your firm accepts ideas from customers or partners
  2. Participative/Skunkworks - the degree to which your firm encourages broad participation in innovation
  3. Incremental/Disruptive - what is the intent of the innovation program?
  4. Centralized/Decentralized - where is innovation controlled?
  5. Suggestive/Directed - how should ideas be generated
  6. Individual/Team - who should work on ideas?
  7. Wisdom of crowds/Experts - who should rate and evaluate ideas
  8. Product/Service/Business model - what's the appropriate outcome of ideas

Facets reviewed

Clearly these facets are not mutually exclusive - it is entirely possible to run an incremental campaign and a disruptive campaign in the same organization. Additionally, these facets are configurable. Defining a "closed" innovation process at the outset does not mean that a firm won't accept ideas from consumers or partners eventually.

However, thinking through these facets and defining the innovation model reveals implications. For example, if we decide to receive ideas from customers or partners, what are the reviews necessary to ensure the receiving firm owns the IP and does not violate another firm's IP? This additional effort alone may be enough to convince a firm not to accept ideas from customers or partners initially.

Innovation Model

Once your team has determined how each facet should be deployed in the innovation program, you've defined an innovation model. That model is not fixed, but it does define the approach and outlook and expected outcomes for innovation in the short term. The model helps everyone understand what is in scope and important, and what ideas may not be appropriate at this time. Defining the model and communicating its expectations and scope will help everyone get "on board" more quickly.

Conclusion

Alexander Pope once wrote that "fools rush in where angels fear to tread" and we believe that's the case for innovation. Many firms rush into innovation without a defined model or clear objectives or outcomes. Taking the time to consider each facet and how it aligns to your business, its culture and capabilities, and making explicit decisions about your innovation model will pay off down the road.

Social Networking

As innovators, we are often called on to watch for and synthesize trends, so we can help our clients predict the future and create new products and services. One new trend we've been watching for a while is the concept of innovation using social networking and wisdom of crowds. As you'd expect from this newsletter, we have strong opinions about these phenomena.

Gathering ideas

A number of new software products and websites have sprung up recently to encourage the submission of ideas - online idea suggestion boxes, social networking sites, innovation forums and many others. The most well-known and well-publicized site is Dell's IdeaStorm site. These sites allow anyone, anywhere to submit ideas about topics of interest to them. While there are some advantages to this approach, there are some significant concerns to think about before taking this approach. In particular:
  • Keeping the idea generation focused on topics that are important to you
  • Managing the volume of ideas - Dell's Ideastorm has over 9000 currently
  • Implementing a process to do something with the ideas beyond collecting and voting
  • Gaining real insights beyond the expectations and knowledge of the crowd

If something seems too easy

If it seems to be too easy to be true, then it's probably a new website. Innovation requires more than simply collecting a lot of ideas from a generally dispersed audience and allowing them to vote on the ideas they submitted. If you don't direct the idea generation into topics of interest to you, the suggestion box will be full of ideas of interest to the submitters but quite possibly at odds with your product or service strategy. Then you've collected ideas and set expectations about those ideas with your customers that you don't want to implement.

Drowning in ideas

Just as your IT team is drowning in data from all the system that they manage, this approach can literally drown the innovation team in ideas. As mentioned, Dell's IdeaStorm has over 9000 ideas, and a well run, one or two week idea campaign can easily generate several hundred on one topic. Talk about finding a needle in a stack of needles! Then consider the time necessary to review and process those ideas. Assume for a second that each idea requires between five and ten minutes for a person to review and decide to move forward with, request more information or kill. 9000 ideas at 5 minutes each (an underestimate) is 45,000 minutes or 750 hours - almost a third of a man year just dedicated to a quick review of each idea. Then add in the fact that ideas from customers and partners need a legal review for IP ownership, and you'll see that more ideas is not always the best answer.

Workflow

Many social networking sites and forums don't provide workflow or idea management beyond the capture of the idea and a simple voting or rating process. Idea capture is the easiest part of an innovation process, but the bottlenecks exist just downstream - effectively reviewing the ideas, evaluating them and transitioning them into new products or services or business models. Without an effective innovation process to manage the ideas after collection, innovation breaks down. Again, you've set the expectation that these ideas will be captured and reviewed. If not, the submitters will become frustrated and will refuse to submit ideas, and your innovation program and efforts will flounder.

If you know it and I know it

A final concern with social networking and wisdom of crowds is that these programs primarily generate very incremental ideas, and since these approaches are very open, collaborative and web-based, they expose ideas to a large number of people. The larger the group, the more the thinking and ideas will revert to the mean. So you can't expect really insightful or disruptive ideas from this approach, nor can you expect that the ideas you generate from this approach are uniquely yours. Your competitors are listening to and engaging your customer base just as frequently as you are, so broadly distributed idea platforms will result in ideas that have been seen and reviewed by a number of firms.

Part of a solution

So, just like brainstorming does not equal innovation, but is an important tool or component for innovation, many of these new trends around innovation and social networking are not complete solutions. In fact, they may become great distractions. Generating a huge number of ideas that are relatively incremental doesn't add much to a firm's ability to innovate or differentiate, and may become a huge distraction from real disruptive possibilities. Recognize that innovation is a complex function and that every tool - brainstorming, social networking, innovation processes, creativity and a whole list of others - all play into a robust innovation capability and model. No one solution provides all the answers.
Book Review

We at OVO are privileged to receive new books "hot off the press" on innovation to review. We recently received a copy of The Innovator's Guide to Growth and felt it deserved a review in our newsletter.

The Innovator's Guide to Growth is a natural continuation of the Innovator's series by Clayton Christensen (Innovator's Dilemma, Innovator's Solution, etc), but is written by consultants from the firm that Christensen founded, Innosight. In The Innovator's Guide to Growth, the authors take a lot of the concepts Christensen created in his books and make them more applicable and practical for an innovator. This is the first book that moves from education and advocacy into practical advice for innovators.

What we liked about the book

Scott Anthony and his co-authors have written a book that provides a detailed plan for innovation, breaking down the approach to innovation into stages - planning, identifying opportunities and building processes. Anthony and the other authors follow a lot of what Christensen said about disruptive innovation - especially identifying the underserved or those who aren't served by existing offerings - what they call nonconsumers. They leverage the "jobs to be done" model from Christensen as well, examining innovation from a customer's viewpoint rather than an inside-out viewpoint. There is a short but strong chapter on innovation metrics as well.

The book focused less on success stories and analogies and more on practical advice, tools, techniques and templates.

Where we felt the book could be stronger

The Innovator's Guide to growth assumes most of the focus on innovation will be disruptive, so it has less interest and patience to consider incremental or breakthrough thinking. The book assumes most innovation will originate from developing offerings for nonconsumers, so it spends less time than expected in reviewing trends and unidentified opportunities. The book doesn't spend enough time on building out an innovation competency - rather it focuses on innovation projects, and doesn't address key cultural issues like rewards, recognition and culture.

Our Take

This book belongs on the desk of any innovator who is leading an innovation program. It has a good focus on disruptive innovation and its early chapters on planning and strategy are well developed. We'd augment it with (shameless plug) Make us more Innovative, because we believe there's more definition necessary in the innovation processes, roles and responsibilities, and that the culture, communication and rewards that innovation requires are not well addressed.

PDMA International

The PDMA holds an international conference each year, and the focus of the event has a strong focus on innovation. This year's event is scheduled for September 13 - 15 in Orlando. OVO is chairing a track in this program on the skills and capabilities necessary for innovation. At this year's PDMA International conference, you'll have a chance to interact with leading innovation thinkers in the "Guru" studio and learn practical tools and processes for innovation. See more about the event here, and if you decide to attend, use this code SP08IC to get a 20% discount. I hope we'll see you in September in Orlando!

Frost & Sullivan Growth and Innovation Conference

I've had the opportunity to participate in this event. I'd highly recommend it, since there is a lot of opportunity for interaction and exchange, and many of the attendees are fairly senior in their roles and experience. Frost&Sullivan does a good job with this conference and encouraging interaction between the attendees.

Business Innovation Factor Event

We've attended this event for several years and find it inspiring and encouraging for innovators. The Business Innovation Factory sponsors a story telling conference and brings in innovation practitioners from a wide array of companies to talk about their experiences. A small, intimate program focused on lessons learned and the experiences of starting or running innovation programs.

If you'd like to discuss how OVO can work with you to improve your innovation strategies, ideation sessions, innovation processes or software, contact us today at our website or (919) 844-5644 x789.

If you have a topic you'd like to see us cover or a question you'd like to have us address, please let us know via the website above.

If you enjoyed this innovation newsletter, please pass it along to your friends. If you wish to unsubscribe, please see the link below.

Sincerely,


Jeffrey Phillips
OVO

phone: 919-844-5644 x789